Tuesday, July 30, 2013
A Constructive Compliment
I found this article on Courtney Robertson's blog and her evaluation very well rounded and interesting. So many people immediately discount Rick Perry based on previous actions and interactions he has had both in the political and the personal arena. I find that to be especially true in Austin news media and it is interesting to hear an evaluation from the other side.
I find it interesting that these sources automatically assume that he isn’t running for governor again so that he can run for President (since that is what stopped him from winning last time, right). When you combine this with the common 'He's so dumb how could he run the country' routine we see any time a good ole boy runs for office it’s amazing that they forget that he has been re-elected multiple times. He’s obviously doing something right, and has had a positive influence over the state in various forms.
I found your call out that the majority of Texans, and other Americans have a knowledge of who Perry is and the follies he performed during his last run refreshing, as well as your call out that you also recognized the intended article of the source material you were reading. I also love that you mentioned that which the article did not; that both sides have weaknesses. While pieces such as the one you reviewed have a tendency to ignore the weaknesses of the side they are advocating for it is nice to see that you as an educated reader were able to pick-up on it and acknowledge this as a real problem for both parties.
I personally don't think he has a snowballs chance in hell at winning, but not for the reasons that most papers cite. I’ll be interested to see how 2016 turns out and whom the parties chose to represent them in what will inevitably be a battle to be remembered.
Wednesday, July 24, 2013
Austin.. The Breeding Ground of the Armchair Advocate.
While I’m a huge fan of diversity and a difference of
opinion I got to say I hate the armchair activists that live in this city.
Everyone has a cause and I respect that especially if you are well informed,
educated, and passionate about the topic that affects you. What I have a
problem with are those people who pop off at the mouth, quote rumor as fact,
and hop on board with any bandwagon issue that happens to be this week’s Social
Media cause of the week.
Austin seems to have a large group, in my experience, with
those that are less informed but way more vocal than other areas in which I
have lived. I find this very interesting because Austin is the state capital
and has one of the best colleges in the country with an extremely active
liberal following and political program. Yet despite this mecca of knowledge
the masses are fine with just reading about the events on Social Media,
changing their internet picture and showing up to a rally that someone setup on
Facebook.
What does this have to do with Government? Our local government
is failing this generation. Rather than engage them via the avenues in which
they can gather the most attention (like Reddit, Facebook, Twitter, etc) and
harness the young political minds that are at their fingertips, I feel like
they are just playing to the ‘Old School’ by making large scale decisions and
holding city hearings in a boring drab ass council chamber. They focus on
issues not relevant to the younger masses and or those issues that aren't ‘sexy’
or are too controversial. With the majority of this city being liberal, and
children from all over Texas flocking here for school they are missing a huge
chance to cross pollinate, educate, inform, and the redistribute the knowledge
and the masses across the rest of the state. Planting the seed is only the first step, but if presented in a mobile, consumable way , their attention span IS limited to 144 characters, you increase the chance of them actually looking deeper into the issue than just the tagline.
We may have a chance to actually fix this state, but only if people stop posting about it, and start doing something about it, people and politicians both.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013
Texas.. We got a Code Blue...
Its no doubt that our health care system has its problems, whether
its funding, coverage, insurance companies, politicians or red tape. Rarely do
you think of Doctors being a problem.
In a Dallas Morning News editorial
labeled “What
does it take to shut down a hospital” discusses the issue and controversy
surround just one type of Doctor.
In America we love a feel good story, especially if that
story has to due with protecting the weak and sick, and aiding business. Enter
Dr Mahmood who has a habit of taking over failing hospitals, which one would
think is a noble cause. Unfortunately the “Good” Dr has a habit of running them
even further into the ground, stealing and extorting money from insurance and
patients and having shitty service that has resulted in death.
The even more appalling thing… This has happened
approximately 6 times. How does that happen our author asks? He attributes it
to poor communication between government organizations, which is no surprise to
this reader.
Both state and local officials have cited Mahmood’s 6
hospitals over the last 5 years, including onsite inspections resulting in
power outages, unpaid taxes, poor venting and air circulations and false
billing. I can see 6 hospitals having problems, even some as bad as the ones
cited, but I would think that a red flag would go up in some governmental system
of 6 failing hospitals were bought by the same guy.
An interesting article that reinforces why I hate doctors
and resolve what ails me the old fashion way... by rubbing dirt on it, taking a
swig of whiskey and walking it off.
West Texas... Remember that?
Its been almost 2 months since our social media feeds
exploded, excuse the pun, with news about the West Texas explosion. In typical
fashion as all things social media once it was off our feed, it was out of our
thoughts.
Not so with the Editorial titled Demanding
Answers on West Explosion in the Dallas Morning news in which we see two
unlikely allies, a California Democrat and an Austin Republican working
together to call for answers.
In this interesting example of bi-partisan cooperation the
author calls out the, gripes and concerns that have been made, including the
failure of the Department of Homeland Security to properly identify the West
Facility as potential risk that needs to be identified on the watch list. I’m inclined
to agree with our authors level of confusion regarding why a facility, with a
history of break-ins, holding large quantities of a known ingredient in
explosive devices previously used in previous terrorist attacks wasn't on the list
of an entity whose entire job was to keep our homeland… secure. /facepalm
More surprised was I to read that a California Democrat said
something intelligent. Normally they spew a bunch of random jibber jabber
trying to use some scare tactics to get what they want. Barbara Boxer stated
that large quantities of caustic and explosive material should be documented in
case of emergency and kept in a separate location far away from largely
populated areas. While I wouldn't call West a densely populated area, I do agree
that with all the space out there it seems interesting to keep it so close to
town.
Overall I enjoyed reading this sensible editorial regarding
a tragic mistake. I hope that this doesn't fall on deaf ears and that we work
to fix existing problems before focusing on this week’s new cause.
Monday, July 15, 2013
Tampon Gate: They took my Tampons (and my feces)!
With all the
Abortion Bill stuff in the news I was interested when I started hearing about
the tampons being confiscated at the Capitol. I followed up with one my favorite
sensationalist Austin News organizations the Burnt Orange Report. In their
article After
Tampongate, We Have Some Questions for Texas DPS they pose accusatory questions
regarding the actions of officers.
The article
first says the officers were peaceful and polite helping people into overflow
rooms, but later state that they assaulted peaceful protestors, ignored reports
of assault, and stole tampons from the homeless.
What the
article doesn’t state is that after learning that people were being denied
entry because of the tampons “Kirk Watson, D-Austin,
spoke to the sergeant-at-arms and DPS officers were told to allow people to
bring in the products.” According to another news outlet
The DPS has already issued a statement regarding the confiscation of the items which as well as significant quantities of feminine hygiene products, glitter, urine jars, feces, paint and confetti... The BOR article suggests that they DPS is lying about the jars of urine and feces, but makes no mention of the paint, confetti, or glitter. I’m all for people being able to bring in what they need to take care of their bodily functions, but why the urine, feces, glitter etc but does this lady really look like she is getting a visit from Aunt Flo, or does it look like she is armed for battle?
The DPS has already issued a statement regarding the confiscation of the items which as well as significant quantities of feminine hygiene products, glitter, urine jars, feces, paint and confetti... The BOR article suggests that they DPS is lying about the jars of urine and feces, but makes no mention of the paint, confetti, or glitter. I’m all for people being able to bring in what they need to take care of their bodily functions, but why the urine, feces, glitter etc but does this lady really look like she is getting a visit from Aunt Flo, or does it look like she is armed for battle?
The articles on the BOR could do , in my opinion with a bit more fact
finding and actual news reporting on important matters regarding the rights of
people in our fair city.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)